Team profile

MIBR

  • Region Americas
  • Series 36–46
  • Active 2022–2026
  • Last map 2026-08-31

Map win rate by event

10% 50% 90% VCT 2022: Brazil Stage 2 Challengers: 47% over 17 maps VCT 2023: LOCK//IN São Paulo: 0% over 2 maps VCT 2023: Americas League: 32% over 22 maps VCT 2023: Americas LCQ: 0% over 2 maps VCT 2024: Americas Kickoff: 58% over 12 maps VCT 2024: Americas Stage 1: 0% over 10 maps VCT 2024: Americas Stage 2: 27% over 11 maps VCT 2025: Americas Kickoff: 53% over 17 maps VCT 2025: Americas Stage 1: 61% over 23 maps VCT 2025: Masters Toronto: 0% over 4 maps VCT 2025: Americas Stage 2: 45% over 11 maps VCT 2025: Champions: 60% over 15 maps VCT 2026: Americas Kickoff: 44% over 18 maps VCT 2026: Americas Stage 1: 47% over 15 maps VCT 2026: Americas Stage 2: 57% over 23 maps 20222023202420252026

Map win % at the event (2+ maps)50%

Series 82
Maps 202
Rounds 4,323
Map win % 50.0% Better than 53% of 53 teams ▲ +5.4 Career 44.6%
Rd diff / map -0.1 Better than 59% of 53 teams ▲ +0.7 Career -0.8
Attack % 52.9% Better than 76% of 53 teams ▲ +4.1 Career 48.8%
Defense % 47.0% Better than 24% of 52 teams ▼ −0.4 Career 47.4%
Pistol % 43.8% Better than 13% of 53 teams ▼ −1.5 Career 45.3%
Record 36–46 2026: 11–11
Cur Elo 1577 Peak Elo 1737

Pro Valorant team stats · VCT 2022–2026 · Americas · last played 2026-08-31

Scouting report

Season2026Peers53 teamsScopeAll leaguesSample12+ maps each

Results

Series win % 50.0% 48
Map win % 50.0% 53
Round diff / map -0.1 59

Round play

Attack round win % 52.9% 76
Defense round win % 47.0% 24
Pistol win % 43.8% 13
Won after pistol win 89.8% 67
Bounce-back % 39.6% 59

Firepower

Rating 1.00 63
ACS 196.9 59
K/D 1.01 63
Opening duel win % 50.2% 61
Percentile among peerslow high/tick = 50th percentile
MIBR vs 53 teams · 2026 · 12+ maps each vct-reference.com

Map win rate by event

10% 50% 90% VCT 2022: Brazil Stage 2 Challengers: 47% over 17 maps VCT 2023: LOCK//IN São Paulo: 0% over 2 maps VCT 2023: Americas League: 32% over 22 maps VCT 2023: Americas LCQ: 0% over 2 maps VCT 2024: Americas Kickoff: 58% over 12 maps VCT 2024: Americas Stage 1: 0% over 10 maps VCT 2024: Americas Stage 2: 27% over 11 maps VCT 2025: Americas Kickoff: 53% over 17 maps VCT 2025: Americas Stage 1: 61% over 23 maps VCT 2025: Masters Toronto: 0% over 4 maps VCT 2025: Americas Stage 2: 45% over 11 maps VCT 2025: Champions: 60% over 15 maps VCT 2026: Americas Kickoff: 44% over 18 maps VCT 2026: Americas Stage 1: 47% over 15 maps VCT 2026: Americas Stage 2: 57% over 23 maps 20222023202420252026

Map win % at the event (2+ maps)50%

Season by Season

Season Regions Record Maps Rds K D K/D ACS KAST Rating Elo
Career Americas · International 36–46 202 4,323 14,693 14,926 0.98 193.8 71.0% 0.97 1577
2026 Americas 11–11 56 1,173 4,055 4,020 1.01 196.9 71.9% 1.00 1577
2025 Americas · International 15–13 70 1,516 5,227 5,027 1.04 195.1 72.4% 1.00 1697
2024 Americas 4–11 33 699 2,278 2,569 0.89 186.8 67.5% 0.90 1423
2023 Americas · International 3–8 26 554 1,803 2,016 0.89 187.7 68.3% 0.91 1360
2022 Americas 3–3 17 381 1,330 1,294 1.03 200.9 73.4% 1.02 1468

Recent results

The last 10 series, newest first, scored from this team’s side.

Date Opponent Score Maps Event
Aug 31 LOUD L 0–2 Lotus 10–13 · Sunset 10–13 VCT 2026: Americas Stage 2
Aug 30 Evil Geniuses W 2–1 Lotus 16–18 · Sunset 13–10 · Haven 13–9 VCT 2026: Americas Stage 2
Aug 27 LEVIATÁN L 0–2 Abyss 7–13 · Haven 3–13 VCT 2026: Americas Stage 2
Aug 21 ENVY W 2–1 Sunset 5–13 · Ascent 13–9 · Split 13–5 VCT 2026: Americas Stage 2
Aug 15 KRÜ Esports W 2–0 Breeze 13–6 · Sunset 13–6 VCT 2026: Americas Stage 2
Aug 9 LEVIATÁN L 0–2 Split 10–13 · Sunset 8–13 VCT 2026: Americas Stage 2
Aug 1 Evil Geniuses W 2–0 Haven 14–12 · Ascent 13–2 VCT 2026: Americas Stage 2
Jul 26 FURIA W 2–0 Haven 14–12 · Breeze 13–9 VCT 2026: Americas Stage 2
Jul 23 ENVY W 2–0 Haven 13–4 · Sunset 13–3 VCT 2026: Americas Stage 2
Jul 19 NRG L 1–2 Sunset 13–9 · Breeze 11–13 · Summit 4–13 VCT 2026: Americas Stage 2

Longest-Tenured Players

#PlayerSeries
1.  aspas 50
2.  Verno 44
3.  artzin 43
4.  cortezia 28
5.  xenom 28

Best Players by Rating

#PlayerRating
1.  aspas 1.13
2.  Verno 1.08
3.  zekken 1.03
4.  deNaro 1.02
5.  frz 1.01

Roster by Season

Everyone who played a map for the team that season, most maps first. The number is maps played.

SeasonPlayers
2026 tex 56 ·  zekken 56 ·  Mazino 56 ·  aspas 56 ·  Verno 56
2025 cortezia 70 ·  artzin 70 ·  aspas 70 ·  xenom 70 ·  Verno 53 ·  nzr 17
2024 artzin 33 ·  mazin 33 ·  frz 22 ·  RgLMeister 22 ·  jzz 22 ·  liazzi 11 ·  rich 9 ·  Palla 9 ·  ShahZaM 2 ·  Pa1nt 2
2023 frz 26 ·  murizzz 26 ·  RgLMeister 26 ·  jzz 26 ·  heat 19 ·  TxoziN 7
2022 frz 17 ·  gtn 17 ·  deNaro 17 ·  mNdS 17 ·  jzz 17

Round Play by Season

Round-level team play each season. Hover a rate for its sample.

Season Maps W–LMap Win %Round +/−Attack RoundsDefense Rounds
Career90–11244.6%-16148.8%47.4%
202628–2850.0%-352.9%47.0%
202537–3352.9%+1652.4%48.7%
202410–2330.3%-8543.1%44.9%
20237–1926.9%-9042.3%41.4%
20228–947.1%+143.9%56.2%

Map Win Rate

Every completed map, with the side and pistol round win rates on it. Click a header to sort.

Map Played Won Lost Win% Attack RoundsDefense RoundsPistols Won
Split 28 13 15 46.4% 49.1% 49.7% 53.6%
Haven 25 12 13 48.0% 48.3% 47.3% 40.0%
Lotus 23 8 15 34.8% 44.0% 46.1% 41.3%
Icebox 19 10 9 52.6% 49.2% 53.3% 44.7%
Bind 18 8 10 44.4% 54.2% 41.8% 36.1%
Sunset 18 8 10 44.4% 45.3% 50.5% 33.3%
Ascent 16 4 12 25.0% 39.5% 46.1% 50.0%
Breeze 13 7 6 53.8% 51.0% 51.0% 50.0%
Abyss 12 5 7 41.7% 54.8% 39.3% 54.2%
Pearl 11 5 6 45.5% 53.6% 42.1% 27.3%
Fracture 10 4 6 40.0% 48.6% 52.0% 60.0%
Corrode 8 6 2 75.0% 60.6% 50.0% 68.8%
Summit 1 0 1 0.0% 16.7% 40.0% 50.0%

Map Picks & Bans

From each series’ map veto, most picked first and most banned last. Picks and Bans count series; the win rates count completed maps, split by who chose the map. Hover a rate for its record.

Most picked: Split (5) · Most banned: Pearl (11)

Map Picks Bans 1st ban Own pick Opp. pick Decider
All maps 25 41 22 44% 11–14 58% 14–10 43% 3–4
Split 5 2 1 40% 2–3 50% 1–1 50% 1–1
Sunset 4 1 0 50% 2–2 67% 2–1 —
Bind 3 0 0 67% 2–1 — —
Breeze 3 0 0 67% 2–1 40% 2–3 100% 1–0
Corrode 2 1 0 50% 1–1 100% 1–0 —
Abyss 1 1 0 0% 0–1 25% 1–3 —
Haven 4 5 1 50% 2–2 60% 3–2 50% 1–1
Lotus 2 3 1 0% 0–2 100% 1–0 —
Fracture 1 2 1 0% 0–1 100% 1–0 —
Ascent 0 6 0 — 100% 2–0 0% 0–1
Summit 0 9 9 — — 0% 0–1
Pearl 0 11 9 — — —

Veto known for 22 of 22 series.

Record vs Every Opponent

Series and map record against each team faced, most-met first. Rounds is the round difference over those maps.

Players Who Play Best Against Them

All 165 opposing players who faced this team on 2+ maps, ranked by how far their rating against it beats their usual.

Frequently Asked

Who is MIBR?

MIBR is a professional Valorant (VCT) team competing in Americas, active across 2022–2026 (5 seasons) — 202 maps played, a 36–46 series record (43.9% win rate), a peak Elo of 1737. Their strongest map is Corrode (75.0% over 8 maps).

What is MIBR's win rate in VCT?

MIBR holds a 36–46 series record in VCT (2022–2026), a 43.9% win rate across 202 maps.

Compare with another team →

Which maps is MIBR best and worst on?

MIBR's strongest map in VCT is Corrode, where they win 75.0% (6–2 over 8 maps); their weakest is Ascent at 25.0% (4–12 over 16 maps).

Map & series records →

How long has MIBR competed in VCT?

MIBR has competed in VCT from 2022 to 2026, 5 seasons in Americas, playing 202 maps and 4,323 rounds; last active 2026-08-31.

What is MIBR's Elo rating in VCT?

MIBR carries a current Elo of 1577 in the VCT Reference model, having peaked at 1737 (in 2025).

Team & player leaderboards →

Who has played the most for MIBR?

aspas has played the most VCT series for MIBR: 50, ahead of Verno.

Who is MIBR's best player?

By rating, aspas is the best VCT player to play for MIBR: a 1.13 rating with the team.

Who is MIBR's biggest rival?

MIBR has met LEVIATÁN more than any other team in VCT: 9 series, with MIBR trailing 3–6.

How many maps has MIBR played in VCT?

MIBR has played 202 VCT maps across 4,323 rounds since 2022, with a 0.98 team K/D and a 0.97 team rating.

Sortable leaderboards →