Team profile
Guangzhou Huadu Bilibili Gaming
Map win rate by event
Map win % at the event (2+ maps)50%
Pro Valorant team stats · VCT 2023–2026 · China · last played 2026-08-22
Scouting report
Results
Round play
Firepower
Results
Round play
Firepower
Results
Round play
Firepower
Results
Round play
Firepower
Results
Round play
Firepower
Map win rate by event
Map win % at the event (2+ maps)50%
Season by Season
| Season | Regions | Record | Maps | Rds | K | D | K/D | ACS | KAST | Rating | Elo |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Career | China · International | 42–37 | 211 | 4,480 | 15,639 | 15,522 | 1.01 | 199.7 | 71.6% | 1.02 | 1490 |
| 2026 | China | 12–10 | 60 | 1,284 | 4,452 | 4,499 | 0.99 | 199.7 | 71.1% | 1.00 | 1490 |
| 2025 | China · International | 17–11 | 78 | 1,657 | 5,865 | 5,583 | 1.05 | 201.5 | 73.0% | 1.06 | 1574 |
| 2024 | China · International | 8–11 | 45 | 954 | 3,269 | 3,342 | 0.98 | 197.7 | 63.0% | 0.80 | 1432 |
| 2023 | China · International | 5–5 | 28 | 585 | 2,053 | 2,098 | 0.98 | 198.2 | 69.5% | 0.95 | 1663 |
Recent results
The last 10 series, newest first, scored from this team’s side.
| Date | Opponent | Score | Maps | Event |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 22 | TYLOO | L 0–3 | Sunset 12–14 · Summit 6–13 · Split 15–17 | VCT 2026: China Stage 2 |
| Aug 21 | JD Gaming | L 0–2 | Lotus 7–13 · Split 8–13 | VCT 2026: China Stage 2 |
| Aug 19 | Xi Lai Gaming | W 2–1 | Lotus 13–11 · Split 8–13 · Haven 13–5 | VCT 2026: China Stage 2 |
| Aug 15 | Trace Esports | W 2–1 | Lotus 8–13 · Sunset 16–14 · Split 13–9 | VCT 2026: China Stage 2 |
| Jul 26 | Nova Esports | L 0–2 | Breeze 8–13 · Ascent 7–13 | VCT 2026: China Stage 2 |
| Jul 20 | Xi Lai Gaming | W 2–1 | Lotus 13–2 · Summit 8–13 · Ascent 13–11 | VCT 2026: China Stage 2 |
| Jul 18 | Wuxi Titan Esports Club | W 2–1 | Summit 13–10 · Split 9–13 · Haven 13–6 | VCT 2026: China Stage 2 |
| Jul 16 | All Gamers | W 2–1 | Summit 13–9 · Haven 10–13 · Sunset 13–9 | VCT 2026: China Stage 2 |
| Jul 11 | Wolves Esports | W 2–1 | Summit 13–9 · Split 4–13 · Lotus 13–5 | VCT 2026: China Stage 2 |
| Jul 9 | Dragon Ranger Gaming | L 0–2 | Haven 13–15 · Lotus 7–13 | VCT 2026: China Stage 2 |
Roster by Season
Everyone who played a map for the team that season, most maps first. The number is maps played.
| Season | Players |
|---|---|
| 2026 | whzy 60 · nephh 60 · rushia 60 · Knight 51 · FT 27 · bud 20 · yilai 13 · Biank 9 |
| 2025 | Knight 78 · whzy 78 · nephh 78 · Levius 78 · rushia 78 |
| 2024 | Knight 45 · whzy 45 · yosemite 45 · Biank 24 · Flex1n 21 · nephh 21 · B3ar 17 · Levius 7 |
| 2023 | Biank 28 · DK 28 · Knight 28 · whzy 28 · yosemite 28 |
Round Play by Season
Round-level team play each season. Hover a rate for its sample.
Round win % by buy matchup, on team loadout value (equipment held): Full 20k+, Semi 10–20k, Eco under 10k — every matchup with a full buy on one side; this team’s buy first, pistol rounds excluded. China league maps record no economy, shown as —.
| Season | Maps W–L | Map Win % | Round +/− | Attack Rounds | Defense Rounds |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Career | 108–103 | 51.2% | +14 | 50.9% | 49.4% |
| 2026 | 29–31 | 48.3% | +8 | 51.9% | 48.7% |
| 2025 | 44–34 | 56.4% | +45 | 53.4% | 49.3% |
| 2024 | 21–24 | 46.7% | -30 | 46.7% | 50.1% |
| 2023 | 14–14 | 50.0% | -9 | 48.7% | 49.7% |
| Season | Pistols Won | Won After Pistol Win | Won After Pistol Loss |
|---|---|---|---|
| Career | 50.5% | 90.6% | 11.5% |
| 2026 | 50.8% | 95.1% | 10.2% |
| 2025 | 55.8% | 89.7% | 18.8% |
| 2024 | 45.6% | 82.9% | 4.1% |
| 2023 | 42.9% | 95.8% | 9.4% |
| Season | Force Rate | Won on Forces | Bounce-Back |
|---|---|---|---|
| Career | 28.3% | 46.3% | 39.9% |
| 2026 | — | — | 40.3% |
| 2025 | 26.5% | 46.2% | 39.9% |
| 2024 | 20.0% | 60.0% | 41.5% |
| 2023 | 33.8% | 43.5% | 36.0% |
| Season | Full v Full | Full v Semi | Full v Eco | Semi v Full | Eco v Full |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Career | 46.5% | 42.7% | 78.6% | 36.0% | 11.8% |
| 2026 | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2025 | 50.0% | 37.5% | 66.7% | 29.0% | 0.0% |
| 2024 | 29.6% | 0.0% | 100.0% | 50.0% | 20.0% |
| 2023 | 48.4% | 54.1% | 91.7% | 39.3% | 20.0% |
Map Win Rate
Every completed map, with the side and pistol round win rates on it. Click a header to sort.
| Map | Played | Won | Lost | Win% | Attack Rounds | Defense Rounds | Pistols Won |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lotus | 41 | 22 | 19 | 53.7% | 53.3% | 49.0% | 48.8% |
| Haven | 27 | 10 | 17 | 37.0% | 51.2% | 45.9% | 48.1% |
| Bind | 24 | 12 | 12 | 50.0% | 48.8% | 48.1% | 39.6% |
| Split | 21 | 7 | 14 | 33.3% | 42.5% | 47.7% | 52.4% |
| Icebox | 19 | 11 | 8 | 57.9% | 55.6% | 45.7% | 47.4% |
| Ascent | 16 | 10 | 6 | 62.5% | 47.0% | 60.5% | 46.9% |
| Sunset | 16 | 9 | 7 | 56.3% | 46.8% | 54.7% | 56.3% |
| Pearl | 15 | 10 | 5 | 66.7% | 55.1% | 57.7% | 53.3% |
| Fracture | 10 | 5 | 5 | 50.0% | 61.7% | 41.3% | 60.0% |
| Abyss | 8 | 5 | 3 | 62.5% | 64.8% | 40.2% | 75.0% |
| Breeze | 7 | 3 | 4 | 42.9% | 48.1% | 48.1% | 57.1% |
| Summit | 5 | 3 | 2 | 60.0% | 41.5% | 57.4% | 50.0% |
| Corrode | 2 | 1 | 1 | 50.0% | 42.9% | 54.2% | 50.0% |
Map Picks & Bans
From each series’ map veto, most picked first and most banned last. Picks and Bans count series; the win rates count completed maps, split by who chose the map. Hover a rate for its record.
Most picked: Abyss, Lotus (5) · Most banned: Split (9)
| Map | Picks | Bans | 1st ban | Own pick | Opp. pick | Decider |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| All maps | 25 | 41 | 22 | 54% 13–11 | 32% 8–17 | 73% 8–3 |
| Abyss | 5 | 0 | 0 | 60% 3–2 | 100% 1–0 | — |
| Lotus | 5 | 0 | 0 | 25% 1–3 | 67% 2–1 | 100% 1–0 |
| Summit | 4 | 0 | 0 | 50% 2–2 | 100% 1–0 | — |
| Pearl | 4 | 2 | 0 | 100% 4–0 | 0% 0–1 | 100% 1–0 |
| Fracture | 2 | 1 | 0 | 50% 1–1 | 0% 0–1 | — |
| Breeze | 3 | 7 | 6 | 67% 2–1 | 0% 0–1 | 50% 1–1 |
| Ascent | 0 | 4 | 0 | — | 0% 0–1 | 100% 1–0 |
| Bind | 0 | 4 | 0 | — | 33% 1–2 | 0% 0–1 |
| Haven | 0 | 4 | 1 | — | 20% 1–4 | 100% 2–0 |
| Sunset | 0 | 4 | 2 | — | 50% 1–1 | 100% 1–0 |
| Corrode | 0 | 6 | 6 | — | — | — |
| Split | 2 | 9 | 7 | 0% 0–2 | 17% 1–5 | 50% 1–1 |
Veto known for 22 of 22 series.
Record vs Every Opponent
Series and map record against each team faced, most-met first. Rounds is the round difference over those maps.
All 112 opposing players who faced this team on 2+ maps, ranked by how far their rating against it beats their usual.
Frequently Asked
Who is Guangzhou Huadu Bilibili Gaming?
Guangzhou Huadu Bilibili Gaming is a professional Valorant (VCT) team competing in China, active across 2023–2026 (4 seasons) — 211 maps played, a 42–37 series record (53.2% win rate), a peak Elo of 1742. Their strongest map is Pearl (66.7% over 15 maps).
What is Guangzhou Huadu Bilibili Gaming's win rate in VCT?
Guangzhou Huadu Bilibili Gaming holds a 42–37 series record in VCT (2023–2026), a 53.2% win rate across 211 maps.
Which maps is Guangzhou Huadu Bilibili Gaming best and worst on?
Guangzhou Huadu Bilibili Gaming's strongest map in VCT is Pearl, where they win 66.7% (10–5 over 15 maps); their weakest is Split at 33.3% (7–14 over 21 maps).
How long has Guangzhou Huadu Bilibili Gaming competed in VCT?
Guangzhou Huadu Bilibili Gaming has competed in VCT from 2023 to 2026, 4 seasons in China, playing 211 maps and 4,480 rounds; last active 2026-08-22.
What is Guangzhou Huadu Bilibili Gaming's Elo rating in VCT?
Guangzhou Huadu Bilibili Gaming carries a current Elo of 1490 in the VCT Reference model, having peaked at 1742 (in 2023).
Who has played the most for Guangzhou Huadu Bilibili Gaming?
whzy has played the most VCT series for Guangzhou Huadu Bilibili Gaming: 79, ahead of Knight.
Who is Guangzhou Huadu Bilibili Gaming's best player?
By rating, whzy is the best VCT player to play for Guangzhou Huadu Bilibili Gaming: a 1.11 rating with the team.
Who is Guangzhou Huadu Bilibili Gaming's biggest rival?
Guangzhou Huadu Bilibili Gaming has met EDward Gaming more than any other team in VCT: 11 series, with Guangzhou Huadu Bilibili Gaming trailing 4–7.
How many maps has Guangzhou Huadu Bilibili Gaming played in VCT?
Guangzhou Huadu Bilibili Gaming has played 211 VCT maps across 4,480 rounds since 2023, with a 1.01 team K/D and a 1.02 team rating.