China · 2025
VCT 2025: China Stage 2
VCT 2025: China Stage 2 was a China-league Valorant (VCT) event played Jul 3 – Aug 24, 2025: 12 teams, 42 series, 110 maps. Guangzhou Huadu Bilibili Gaming won it, beating Dragon Ranger Gaming 3–1 in the final. EDward Gaming finished third.
Pro Valorant (VCT) tournament · Jul 3 – Aug 24, 2025 · China · Final ↗
- Teams
- 12
- Series
- 42
- Maps
- 110
- League
- China
- Champion
- Guangzhou Huadu Bilibili Gaming Final 3–1 vs Dragon Ranger Gaming
Event Awards
| Team | W–L | Maps | Map% | Atk% | Def% | Pistol% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Guangzhou Huadu Bilibili Gaming | 7–2 | 18–8 | 69.2% | 54.8% | 56.5% | 59.6% |
| Dragon Ranger Gaming | 6–3 | 15–12 | 55.6% | 54.7% | 48.6% | 55.6% |
| EDward Gaming | 6–4 | 14–11 | 56.0% | 50.3% | 51.2% | 52.0% |
| Xi Lai Gaming | 5–3 | 12–8 | 60.0% | 58.3% | 49.5% | 60.0% |
| All Gamers | 4–4 | 11–10 | 52.4% | 52.0% | 49.1% | 50.0% |
| TYLOO | 4–4 | 9–9 | 50.0% | 50.3% | 50.5% | 61.1% |
| FunPlus Phoenix | 3–3 | 7–8 | 46.7% | 51.3% | 50.6% | 40.0% |
| Trace Esports | 3–3 | 7–9 | 43.8% | 44.6% | 55.7% | 46.9% |
| JD Gaming | 1–4 | 6–9 | 40.0% | 41.5% | 47.9% | 36.7% |
| Nova Esports | 1–4 | 5–9 | 35.7% | 48.7% | 41.5% | 42.9% |
| Wuxi Titan Esports Club | 1–4 | 3–8 | 27.3% | 34.5% | 54.9% | 40.9% |
| Wolves Esports | 1–4 | 3–9 | 25.0% | 41.7% | 39.7% | 29.2% |
Map Pick & Ban Rates
| Map | Played | Pick% | Ban% |
|---|---|---|---|
| Lotus | 23 | 20.9% | 35.7% |
| Haven | 20 | 18.2% | 42.9% |
| Sunset | 17 | 15.5% | 54.8% |
| Ascent | 15 | 13.6% | 57.1% |
| Corrode | 13 | 11.8% | 69.0% |
| Icebox | 11 | 10.0% | 66.7% |
| Bind | 11 | 10.0% | 64.3% |
Agent Pick Rates
Pick% is the share of the 220 team-maps (each map counted once per side) the agent was on; Win% is how often the team picking it won that map.
| # | Agent | Role | Picks | Pick% | Win% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1. | Controller | 189 | 85.9% | 50.3% | |
| 2. | Initiator | 113 | 51.4% | 49.6% | |
| 3. | Controller | 111 | 50.5% | 55.0% | |
| 4. | Duelist | 85 | 38.6% | 52.9% | |
| 5. | Initiator | 84 | 38.2% | 50.0% | |
| 6. | Duelist | 82 | 37.3% | 47.6% | |
| 7. | Sentinel | 72 | 32.7% | 48.6% | |
| 8. | Duelist | 56 | 25.5% | 51.8% | |
| 9. | Sentinel | 54 | 24.5% | 50.0% | |
| 10. | Sentinel | 50 | 22.7% | 48.0% | |
| 11. | Sentinel | 35 | 15.9% | 48.6% | |
| 12. | Duelist | 35 | 15.9% | 48.6% | |
| 13. | Initiator | 26 | 11.8% | 50.0% | |
| 14. | Initiator | 22 | 10.0% | 40.9% | |
| 15. | Controller | 18 | 8.2% | 55.6% | |
| 16. | Initiator | 10 | 4.5% | 60.0% | |
| 17. | Controller | 9 | 4.1% | 66.7% | |
| 18. | Duelist | 9 | 4.1% | 22.2% | |
| 19. | Sentinel | 8 | 3.6% | 50.0% | |
| 20. | Controller | 7 | 3.2% | 42.9% | |
| 21. | Duelist | 6 | 2.7% | 50.0% | |
| 22. | Controller | 5 | 2.3% | 20.0% | |
| 23. | Sentinel | 5 | 2.3% | 20.0% | |
| 24. | Initiator | 4 | 1.8% | 75.0% | |
| 25. | Duelist | 3 | 1.4% | 33.3% | |
| 26. | Duelist | 2 | 0.9% | 50.0% |
Compositions by Role
| Composition | Maps | Share | Win% |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 Duelist · 1 Initiator · 2 Controller · 1 Sentinel | 92 | 41.8% | 56.5% |
| 2 Duelist · 1 Initiator · 1 Controller · 1 Sentinel | 43 | 19.5% | 41.9% |
| 1 Duelist · 2 Initiator · 1 Controller · 1 Sentinel | 32 | 14.5% | 46.9% |
| 1 Duelist · 1 Initiator · 1 Controller · 2 Sentinel | 23 | 10.5% | 43.5% |
| 2 Duelist · 1 Initiator · 2 Controller | 19 | 8.6% | 52.6% |
| 1 Duelist · 2 Initiator · 2 Controller | 7 | 3.2% | 57.1% |
| 1 Initiator · 1 Controller · 3 Sentinel | 3 | 1.4% | 33.3% |
| 1 Initiator · 2 Controller · 2 Sentinel | 1 | 0.5% | 0.0% |
Most-Played Lineups
| Map | Agents | Played | Win% |
|---|---|---|---|
| Haven | 18 | 61.1% | |
| Lotus | 16 | 68.8% | |
| Icebox | 12 | 58.3% | |
| Sunset | 9 | 55.6% | |
| Lotus | 8 | 50.0% | |
| Lotus | 7 | 57.1% | |
| Haven | 6 | 50.0% | |
| Lotus | 6 | 33.3% | |
| Ascent | 5 | 60.0% | |
| Ascent | 5 | 60.0% |
Biggest Comebacks
| # | Down | Low Point | Score | Map | Matchup | Event | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 6 | 4–10 | 15–13 | Sunset | Guangzhou Huadu Bilibili Gaming vs EDward Gaming | VCT 2025: China Stage 2 | 2025-08-03 | ↗ |
| 2 | 5 | 4–9 | 15–13 | Ascent | JD Gaming vs Guangzhou Huadu Bilibili Gaming | VCT 2025: China Stage 2 | 2025-07-18 | ↗ |
| 3 | 5 | 3–8 | 14–12 | Icebox | Nova Esports vs Dragon Ranger Gaming | VCT 2025: China Stage 2 | 2025-07-06 | ↗ |
| 4 | 5 | 2–7 | 13–10 | Sunset | Dragon Ranger Gaming vs All Gamers | VCT 2025: China Stage 2 | 2025-07-20 | ↗ |
Biggest Head-to-Head Stomps
| # | Killer | Victim | K For | K Agst | Diff | Diff/Rd | Matchup | Event | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | FPXLife | NOVAcb | 19 | 0 | 19 | 0.32 | FunPlus Phoenix vs Nova Esports | VCT 2025: China Stage 2 | 2025-07-17 | ↗ |
| 2 | AGShr1mp | NOVAo0o0o | 19 | 3 | 16 | 0.25 | All Gamers vs Nova Esports | VCT 2025: China Stage 2 | 2025-07-25 | ↗ |
| 3 | FPXLife | DRGvo0kashu | 20 | 6 | 14 | 0.22 | FunPlus Phoenix vs Dragon Ranger Gaming | VCT 2025: China Stage 2 | 2025-07-24 | ↗ |
| 4 | DRGvo0kashu | BLGwhzy | 17 | 4 | 13 | 0.19 | Dragon Ranger Gaming vs Guangzhou Huadu Bilibili Gaming | VCT 2025: China Stage 2 | 2025-08-22 | ↗ |
| 5 | TEKai | EDGSmoggy | 17 | 4 | 13 | 0.19 | Trace Esports vs EDward Gaming | VCT 2025: China Stage 2 | 2025-08-10 | ↗ |
Most Kills in a Map
| # | Player | K | D | Map | Score | Matchup | Event | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | JDGstew↗ | 35 | 22 | Ascent | 15–13 | JD Gaming vs Guangzhou Huadu Bilibili Gaming | VCT 2025: China Stage 2 | 2025-07-18 | ↗ |
| 2 | NOVAcb↗ | 34 | 20 | Haven | 14–16 | Nova Esports vs Wolves Esports | VCT 2025: China Stage 2 | 2025-08-02 | ↗ |
| 3 | JDGstew↗ | 33 | 15 | Lotus | 13–10 | JD Gaming vs EDward Gaming | VCT 2025: China Stage 2 | 2025-07-31 | ↗ |
| 4 | TYLslowly↗ | 31 | 13 | Icebox | 13–9 | TYLOO vs Guangzhou Huadu Bilibili Gaming | VCT 2025: China Stage 2 | 2025-08-20 | ↗ |
| 5 | EDGZmjjKK↗ | 31 | 19 | Sunset | 13–15 | EDward Gaming vs Guangzhou Huadu Bilibili Gaming | VCT 2025: China Stage 2 | 2025-08-03 | ↗ |
Longest Maps
| # | Score | Rds | Map | OT | Matchup | Event | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 16–14 | 30 | Haven | +6 | Wolves Esports vs Nova Esports | VCT 2025: China Stage 2 | 2025-08-02 | ↗ |
| 2 | 15–13 | 28 | Sunset | +4 | Guangzhou Huadu Bilibili Gaming vs EDward Gaming | VCT 2025: China Stage 2 | 2025-08-03 | ↗ |
| 3 | 15–13 | 28 | Icebox | +4 | Trace Esports vs Guangzhou Huadu Bilibili Gaming | VCT 2025: China Stage 2 | 2025-07-26 | ↗ |
| 4 | 15–13 | 28 | Ascent | +4 | JD Gaming vs Guangzhou Huadu Bilibili Gaming | VCT 2025: China Stage 2 | 2025-07-18 | ↗ |
| 5 | 14–12 | 26 | Bind | +2 | EDward Gaming vs Guangzhou Huadu Bilibili Gaming | VCT 2025: China Stage 2 | 2025-08-23 | ↗ |
Frequently Asked
Who won VCT 2025: China Stage 2?
Guangzhou Huadu Bilibili Gaming won VCT 2025: China Stage 2, beating Dragon Ranger Gaming 3–1 in the final; EDward Gaming finished third.
What was the most picked agent at VCT 2025: China Stage 2?
Omen was picked on 85.9% of team-maps at VCT 2025: China Stage 2 (189 of 220), ahead of Sova at 51.4%; teams picking Omen won 50.3% of those maps.
Which map was played most at VCT 2025: China Stage 2?
Lotus was played 23 times at VCT 2025: China Stage 2 (20.9% of maps); Haven was next with 20.
What team composition was most common at VCT 2025: China Stage 2?
The most common composition at VCT 2025: China Stage 2 was 1 Duelist · 1 Initiator · 2 Controller · 1 Sentinel, run on 41.8% of team-maps with a 56.5% win rate; the single most-played lineup was Killjoy, Neon, Omen, Sova, Viper on Haven (18 times).
How many teams played at VCT 2025: China Stage 2?
12 teams played 42 series and 110 maps at VCT 2025: China Stage 2, Jul 3 – Aug 24, 2025 in the China league.