Team profile

F4Q

  • Region Pacific
  • Series 4–10
  • Active 2021
  • Last map 2021-10-15

Map win rate by event

10% 50% 90% VCT 2021: Korea Stage 1 Masters: 0% over 4 maps VCT 2021: Korea Stage 2 Challengers: 33% over 3 maps VCT 2021: Korea Stage 3 Challengers: 56% over 9 maps VCT 2021: Masters Berlin: 20% over 10 maps VCT 2021: Pacific LCQ: 45% over 11 maps 2021

Map win % at the event (2+ maps)50%

Series 14
Maps 37
Rounds 768
Map win % 35.1% Better than 11% of 57 teams = +0.0 Career 35.1%
Rd diff / map -2.1 Better than 8% of 57 teams = +0.0 Career -2.1
Attack % 47.3% Better than 19% of 56 teams = +0.0 Career 47.3%
Defense % 43.0% Better than 8% of 56 teams = +0.0 Career 43.0%
Pistol % 50.0% Better than 46% of 57 teams = +0.0 Career 50.0%
Record 4–10 2021: 4–10
2021 end-of-season Elo 1483 Peak Elo 1569

Pro Valorant team stats · VCT 2021 · Pacific · last played 2021-10-15

Scouting report

Season2021Peers57 teamsScopeAll leaguesSample12+ maps each

Results

Series win % 28.6% 10
Map win % 35.1% 11
Round diff / map -2.1 8

Round play

Attack round win % 47.3% 19
Defense round win % 43.0% 8
Pistol win % 50.0% 46
Won after pistol win 83.8% 15
Bounce-back % 35.4% 10

Firepower

Rating 0.93 21
ACS 192.0 8
K/D 0.93 11
Opening duel win % 48.0% 20
Percentile among peerslow high/tick = 50th percentile
F4Q vs 57 teams · 2021 · 12+ maps each vct-reference.com

Map win rate by event

10% 50% 90% VCT 2021: Korea Stage 1 Masters: 0% over 4 maps VCT 2021: Korea Stage 2 Challengers: 33% over 3 maps VCT 2021: Korea Stage 3 Challengers: 56% over 9 maps VCT 2021: Masters Berlin: 20% over 10 maps VCT 2021: Pacific LCQ: 45% over 11 maps 2021

Map win % at the event (2+ maps)50%

Season by Season

Season Regions Record Maps Rds K D K/D ACS KAST Rating Elo
2021 Pacific · International 4–10 37 768 2,558 2,765 0.93 192.0 67.1% 0.93 1483

Recent results

The last 10 series, newest first, scored from this team’s side.

Date Opponent Score Maps Event
Oct 15 NUTURN L 1–2 Bind 10–13 · Haven 13–11 · Ascent 8–13 VCT 2021: Pacific LCQ
Oct 14 Global Esports W 2–1 Haven 10–13 · Bind 13–9 · Split 16–14 VCT 2021: Pacific LCQ
Oct 13 FENNEL W 2–1 Split 7–13 · Bind 13–3 · Haven 13–8 VCT 2021: Pacific LCQ
Oct 12 NORTHEPTION L 0–2 Ascent 6–13 · Icebox 4–13 VCT 2021: Pacific LCQ
Sep 16 Sentinels L 1–2 Breeze 3–13 · Split 13–9 · Haven 4–13 VCT 2021: Masters Berlin
Sep 14 G2 Esports L 0–2 Bind 3–13 · Ascent 6–13 VCT 2021: Masters Berlin
Sep 13 Sentinels L 0–2 Split 9–13 · Breeze 4–13 VCT 2021: Masters Berlin
Sep 10 G2 Esports L 1–2 Ascent 5–13 · Bind 13–9 · Haven 8–13 VCT 2021: Masters Berlin
Aug 15 Vision Strikers L 1–3 Icebox 1–13 · Split 13–9 · Bind 5–13 · Ascent 5–13 VCT 2021: Korea Stage 3 Challengers
Aug 8 DAMWON Gaming W 2–1 Split 12–14 · Bind 14–12 · Haven 13–9 VCT 2021: Korea Stage 3 Challengers

Longest-Tenured Players

#PlayerSeries
1.  fiveK 14
2.  Efina 14
3.  Bunny 14
4.  zunba 12
5.  Esperanza 11

Best Players by Rating

#PlayerRating
1.  Bunny 1.05
2.  zunba 0.99
3.  Esperanza 0.92
4.  Efina 0.87
5.  GodDead 0.86

Roster by Season

Everyone who played a map for the team that season, most maps first. The number is maps played.

SeasonPlayers
2021 fiveK 37 ·  Efina 37 ·  Bunny 37 ·  zunba 33 ·  Esperanza 30 ·  GodDead 7 ·  Daa 4

Round Play by Season

Round-level team play each season. Hover a rate for its sample.

Season Maps W–LMap Win %Round +/−Attack RoundsDefense Rounds
202113–2435.1%-7647.3%43.0%

Map Win Rate

Every completed map, with the side and pistol round win rates on it. Click a header to sort.

Map Played Won Lost Win% Attack RoundsDefense RoundsPistols Won
Bind 10 5 5 50.0% 51.6% 49.1% 60.0%
Ascent 8 1 7 12.5% 48.6% 33.7% 50.0%
Split 8 4 4 50.0% 54.0% 46.9% 43.8%
Haven 7 3 4 42.9% 45.2% 49.4% 64.3%
Breeze 2 0 2 0.0% 11.1% 25.0% 25.0%
Icebox 2 0 2 0.0% 5.9% 28.6% 0.0%

Map Picks & Bans

From each series’ map veto, most picked first and most banned last. Picks and Bans count series; the win rates count completed maps, split by who chose the map. Hover a rate for its record.

Most picked: Split (7) · Most banned: Icebox (6)

Map Picks Bans 1st ban Own pick Opp. pick Decider
All maps 19 10 10 53% 8–7 29% 5–12 0% 0–1
Split 7 0 0 43% 3–4 100% 1–0 —
Haven 6 0 0 100% 3–0 0% 0–3 0% 0–1
Bind 4 2 2 67% 2–1 60% 3–2 —
Ascent 2 0 0 0% 0–2 25% 1–3 —
Breeze 0 2 2 — 0% 0–2 —
Icebox 0 6 6 — 0% 0–2 —

Veto known for 12 of 14 series. Series whose veto was not published are left out of every count above.

Record vs Every Opponent

Series and map record against each team faced, most-met first. Rounds is the round difference over those maps.

Players Who Play Best Against Them

All 38 opposing players who faced this team on 2+ maps, ranked by how far their rating against it beats their usual.

Frequently Asked

Who is F4Q?

F4Q is a professional Valorant (VCT) team competing in Pacific, active across 2021 (1 season) — 37 maps played, a 4–10 series record (28.6% win rate), a peak Elo of 1569. Their strongest map is Bind (50.0% over 10 maps).

What is F4Q's win rate in VCT?

F4Q holds a 4–10 series record in VCT (2021), a 28.6% win rate across 37 maps.

Compare with another team →

Which maps is F4Q best and worst on?

F4Q's strongest map in VCT is Bind, where they win 50.0% (5–5 over 10 maps); their weakest is Ascent at 12.5% (1–7 over 8 maps).

Map & series records →

How long has F4Q competed in VCT?

F4Q has competed in VCT in 2021, 1 season in Pacific, playing 37 maps and 768 rounds; last active 2021-10-15.

What is F4Q's Elo rating in VCT?

F4Q finished its last VCT season, 2021, with an end-of-season Elo of 1483 in the VCT Reference model, having peaked at 1569 (in 2021).

Team & player leaderboards →

Who has played the most for F4Q?

fiveK has played the most VCT series for F4Q: 14, ahead of Efina.

Who is F4Q's best player?

By rating, Bunny is the best VCT player to play for F4Q: a 1.05 rating with the team.

Who is F4Q's biggest rival?

F4Q has met DAMWON Gaming more than any other team in VCT: 3 series, with F4Q trailing 1–2.

How many maps has F4Q played in VCT?

F4Q has played 37 VCT maps across 768 rounds since 2021, with a 0.93 team K/D and a 0.93 team rating.

Sortable leaderboards →